Comparison of asian financial crisis and subprime crisis

Subprime mortgage crisis The s were the decade of subprime borrowers; no longer was this a segment left to fringe lenders. The relaxing of credit lending standards by investment banks and commercial banks drove this about-face. Subprime did not become magically less risky; Wall Street just accepted this higher risk. However, as market power shifted from securitizers to originators and as intense competition from private securitizers undermined GSE power, mortgage standards declined and risky loans proliferated.

Comparison of asian financial crisis and subprime crisis

Numerous conferences analyzed events of a decade earlier and studied ways to prevent a similar crisis. But the conferences had barely ended when a new crisis erupted. The epicenter of the crisis had changed—from Asia to the United States and Europe.

And the buzzwords had, too. Securitization, subprime mortgages, and collateralized debt obligations CDOs seem radically different from the currency pegs, excessive corporate borrowing, and foreign debt that dominated the Asian financial crisis. But the underlying causes of both episodes are similar.

Comparison of asian financial crisis and subprime crisis

Each was triggered by investor panic in the face of uncertainty over the security and valuation of assets, and each featured a liquidity run and rising insolvency in the banking system.

How can policymakers better identify precrisis warning signals? And how can they pinpoint the recurring problems that, if tackled during tranquil times, could mitigate the risk and cushion the impact of future crises? Early warning signals A common backdrop to both crises was abundant liquidity and excessive, imprudent credit expansion.

Prior to the Asian crisis, capital flows into the region surged see Chart 1leading to a sharp rise in bank lending and corporate borrowings. Foreign investors bought high-yielding Asian securities or U. Similarly, the current crisis was preceded by massive flows of capital into the United States to finance its current account deficits.

That abundant liquidity was intermediated by financial institutions into consumer credit and mortgages, which were converted into mortgage-backed securities MBSs and CDOs. The search for yield fueled demand for these structured products by investors, many of whom Comparison of asian financial crisis and subprime crisis their decisions solely on the strength of the AAA ratings afforded by credit rating agencies.

There was also a search for yield by lenders, and the abundance of liquidity tended to lead to lax credit standards. In the Asian financial crisis, credit imprudence came in the form of connected lending to large corporate entities or to megaprojects and property developments that were of dubious commercial viability.

In the subprime crisis, that search led to the proliferation of mortgage loans in the subprime category, the so-called ninja no income, no job, and no assets loans.

Another sign of trouble prior to both crises was the rapid increases in property asset prices. Indeed, such asset bubbles have been linked in past crises to the availability of easy credit.

Comparison of asian financial crisis and subprime crisis

Minsky classified borrowers into three types, in declining order of their ability to make interest and principal payments: The growth of speculative and Ponzi borrowers leads first to an asset bubble and then to the widespread realization that the increased lending is unsustainable.

The result is a sudden pullback in financing and a crash. Such financial instability is apparent in both crises. Subprime mortgage growth, representing speculative and Ponzi borrowing, could have trapped the United States in a superficially virtuous but insidiously vicious housing price cycle.

While house prices were rising, creditors felt safe lending on appreciating collateral, which in turn fed housing demand and prices. Similarly, lending to corporate entities in Asia was spurred by booming economies and easy credit, with many loans ending up in unprofitable projects, sustained only by further debt infusions.

Both of these unsustainable cycles were destined to unravel see Chart 2. Asset market bubbles are notoriously hard to pin down while they are happening. It is also difficult to judge the point at which credit growth changes from being good to being excessive.

Nevertheless, the two crises seem to suggest that prolonged upswings in asset especially property prices and rapid credit growth should trigger enhanced surveillance efforts, as well as a search for possible market distortions.

Recurring problems Alongside common symptoms, the subprime crisis and the Asian crisis exhibited common problems, which could be viewed as underlying illnesses.

To begin with, the credit imprudence shown by lenders in both crises reflected the classic principal-agent problem.

Asian Financial Crisis and Subprime Crisis: A brief comparative study | Andrew-analysis's Blog

But with the "originate and distribute" model, lenders had little incentive to worry about credit standards because they did not retain the loans. Instead, mortgage lenders made loans that they immediately sold to banks, which in turn packaged them as securities.

Lenders were seeking to maximize the fee income from securitization rather than the interest income from loans. With little or no ownership of the underlying loans, credit standards dropped sharply, leading to higher default rates when the property market turned down.

There were also classic cases of moral hazard, because lenders and borrowers faced little if any risk from their activities.

Some of the precrisis Asian banking systems and megaprojects appeared to enjoy de facto bailout guarantees from their governments Krugman,encouraging the banks to lend without regard for the commercial viability of the projects.

Similarly, many banks and corporate entities borrowed in foreign currency at lower interest rates, on the assumption that the pegged exchange rates would be maintained indefinitely.

In the current crisis, investors and banks invested in long-duration, complex structured financial products such as MBSs and CDOs using short-term funds, on the assumption that access to rollover funding would always be available in the highly liquid interbank and money markets because central banks can inject liquidity if necessary.

The recurring problems of agency and moral hazard in all crises may be an indication that they are systemic. Nevertheless, it is the responsibility of policymakers to design systems and policies that minimize such risks and mitigate their impact.

Different policy responses Although the subprime crisis is unfolding, it has moved into the phase of management and resolution. What is striking is how different the policy response is now from the one of a decade ago.May 11,  · Introduction: Economic crises are similar to occurrence of cancer in the human body.

Different cells emerged from the same zygote, it is called mosaicism. Cancer occurs when cells from the same genotype mutate.


The Asia Financial Crisis (AFC) and the Subprime Crisis (SPC) exhibit ‘Mosaics’ type Propagating Mechanism. Published: Wed, 17 May Information Technology is the acquisition, processing, storage and dissemination of vocal, pictorial, textual and numerical information by a microelectronics-based combination of computing and telecommunications.

Commercial Banks - Commercial Banks A commercial bank is a type of financial intermediary and a type of bank. It raises funds by collecting deposits from businesses and consumers via checkable deposits, savings deposits, and time deposits.

The first similarity between Asian financial crisis and Subprime mortgage crisis that can easily be seen is a period of significant economic growth before the crisis started (Allen & Snyder, ). The United States housing bubble was a real estate bubble affecting over half of the U.S. timberdesignmag.comg prices peaked in early , started to decline in and , and reached new lows in On December 30, , the Case–Shiller home price index reported its largest price drop in its history.

The credit crisis resulting from the bursting of the housing bubble is—according to. The financial crisis of –, also known as the global financial crisis and the financial crisis, is considered by many economists to have been the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression of the s..

It began in with a crisis in the subprime mortgage market in the United States, and developed into a full-blown international banking crisis with the collapse of the.

Global Financial Crisis — Global Issues