A lively interview colleagues and I conducted in with Jorge Luis Borges. We talked about the philosophers who have influenced him and his work.
How can I if I should cut commentary examples writing a check on the time it takes me to effectively address one paper?. More facilitative As I wrote commentary for different types of papers, I found my style changing.
With my first commentary exercise I was rather directive, mainly because I did not know any better. But with my second and third paper I became more facilitative, asking many open-ended questions and telling the reader where I became confused and what my expectations were after reading certain passages.
When I began working of English as a Second Language papershowever, I quickly became more directive. I asked no more than two questions in my entire commentary. I defined words and suggested phrases. I started many sentences with the phrase "Please explain", and even though that phrase was in some ways facilitative, it was still in the imperative, an order of sorts.
After writing commentary closely in keeping with both styles, I decided a mix of both is the most helpful. I am having problems, however, finding that middle ground in my commentary. I agonize over every word, phrase, and sentence I write in commentary, wondering if I'm being too controlling or way too vague.
There are also times when one style is much more effective than the other for example, writing commentary on ESL papers ; yet, those times are often very unclear.
Is there a measure of too directive or too facilitative? A Letter or On the paper Where to write my comments has also become an issue for me.
In my personal experience I have always responded better to comments on the paper. I have discovered, however, that with papers that need a lot of work, or have extremely small margins writing on the paper is not possible.
I have, in those cases, resorted to writing a letter to the student with my comments. The letter is attached to the paper, yet the letter is a paper in its own right.
There are limitations to both styles. When writing directly on the paper there is a tendency to make more directive comments. There can also be a problem with the amount of space you have to write in. If you need to write three sentences or questions about one sentence in the paper, there may not be room to write it all.
This also can cause a commentator to not write comments in complete sentences, which will confuse the reader. On the other hand, when writing a letter, there is a tendency to be too general. While a letter forces you to deal with global issues, it might allow you to paint your advice a little too broadly.
I have attempted to get around this by giving advice in my letter paragraph by paragraph see exampleso that the reader knows where I am.
The letter is also separate from the paper, meaning the advice won't be anywhere near the problem area, another issue which the commentator must try to address. I have, to the best of my ability, attempted to combine the two styles. When I write a letter, I tend to quote the sentence that I am referring to and I tend to attack a paper by paragraph.
What I mean by "attacking by paragraph" is that I will write about the issues in paragraph one if there are any issues and label that paragraph of comments in my letter "Paragraph 1", so that the writer knows where I am in the paper.
Yet, I am still struggling with which style to use. When a paper has a lot of problems I end up writing a one to two page letter and not marking a single thing on the paper.
The student part of me is not happy with the idea of the letter with no marks on the paper. I may try marking the paper with numbers and writing the corresponding comment at the end, a "comment by number" style.
Am I being understood? One major concern I have is how I come across to the writer. As I mentioned before, I agonize over every sentence and word I write in commentary; a drawback of commentary is that commentary is all on paper.
Without a conference I can't explain what I meant by a comment.
I worry that I may not be clear. This concern really moves to the forefront when I am writing commentary for ESL papers. The student is speaking a different language and coming from a different culture.
Do they understand what I mean? Do I make references they wouldn't understand?
I remember when I wrote compositions in French for my Elementary and Intermediate French classes during my first year at the University of Richmond. I remember struggling with how to say what I meant.Week 5 (Sept.
6, ) Preaching text: Hebrews  This section is about the power of the Word of God to evoke faith. The Word is unseen, but its power is . Best write my essay service that guarantees timely delivery.
Order online academic paper help for students. Professionally researched & quality custom written . Aug 25, · How to Write a Literary Commentary. In this Article: Article Summary Literary Commentary Help Starting the Literary Commentary Writing the Literary Commentary Polishing the Literary Commentary Community Q&A.
A literary commentary is a detailed analysis of a passage of text, focusing specifically on the text itself%(36). Exam Overview. The AP Human Geography Exam requires students to explain and apply key and supporting geographical concepts. The exam employs multiple-choice questions and free-response questions based on components of the seven major curriculum topics.
Literary terms refer to the technique, style, and formatting used by writers and speakers to masterfully emphasize, embellish, or strengthen their timberdesignmag.comry terms can refer to playful techniques employed by comedians to make us laugh or witty tricks wordsmiths use to coin new words or phrases.
Secure Exam for Classroom Use A secure AP English Language and Composition Exam is available on the AP Course Audit timberdesignmag.com access, sign in to your AP Course Audit account, and click on the Secure Documents link in the Resources section of your Course Status page.