Autocratic versus democratic leadership

It also requires leadership ability. There are two main approaches to leadership, autocratic and democratic. Which you use to an extent depends on the circumstances of your organization, as each type has defining characteristics.

Autocratic versus democratic leadership

Home About organisations Autocratic versus Democratic leadership: Are you the right tool for the right job? Autocratic versus Democratic leadership: The best leadership is said to be Autocratic versus democratic leadership, with effective leaders changing their approach to accommodate their situation.

This can become a challenge when the situation changes rapidly or when the leader is capable of only one approach.

According to Bernard Bassan author and researcher of all things leadership, the autocratic leader tends to: Democratic leaders on the other hand demonstrate the following attributes: So which is better according to research? While the autocratic approach is best applied when organisations need to be turned around quickly, it is also most frequently associated with workers quitting their jobs.

Autocratic leadership tends to be more punitive and the inherent close supervision increases role ambiguity, reduces productivity, and decreases group harmony. The democratic approach on the other hand works best when it is visibly supported by higher authority, members are well-educated, leaders have the skills to conduct meetings with the members, and time can be afforded for trust to develop.

If these factors exist, then the democratic approach results in higher rates of productivity, reduced personnel turnover, reduced absenteeism, and better employee physical and mental health. Which approach is appropriate depends in part on the nature of the follower and the environment.

Democratic leadership is desirable in situations where the workforce becomes educated and seeks greater participation, when business becomes more complex, and when the use of advanced technology increases and there is greater emphasis on team expertise. Immature, dependent, and inexperienced subordinates are more likely to expect and accept authoritarian direction, whereas a democratic approach results in more rapid employee development.

Want to expand on the discussion?

We are often presented with a value judgement of autocratic leadership as bad and democratic leadership as good. This is not always the case. Authoritarian leadership works best with authoritarian followers in an authoritarian culture. There are times when an authoritarian approach is appropriate, as the leader of a high performing group can afford to be more democratic than the leader of a poor performing group.

The right tool for the right job I question how much a leader can operate outside of their preferred method, and to what extent a new leader is necessary when the situation changes.

I also question the extent that the leader creates situations that best suits their approach. A strict collaborative democratic approach is not always the answer either. Practical application can be seen as unrealistic, encouraging passivity, and not being appropriate for all situations or serving the wrong cause.

Leadership studies identify that great leaders derive pleasure from developing the innate potential of others and operate with an integrity and authenticity that comes from being true to themselves. The success of the approach depends not only on the situation but also on the alignment within the leader.

Autocratic versus democratic leadership

Autocratic leaders create top-down, command-and control-situations best suited for their leadership style. Democratic leaders create collaborative, people-focused environments aligned with their mode of operation. What kind of leader do you think you are and what kind of leader would your followers say you are?

Can you and do you change to accommodate your situation? If you are feeling democratic, feel free to collaborate with me in the comments below. If you are overly autocratic, tell me how it is and leave it at that.NURSING.

Differences Between Autocratic & Democratic Leadership | Bizfluent

LEADERSHIP. Extras. Management Style: Five Leadership Types for Nurse Leaders A similar style is the Democratic Leader who encourages open communication and staff The Authoritarian or Autocratic Leadership style is demonstrated when a leader makes all decisions without considering input from staff.

For example, when a first respondent arrives at the scene of an accident, the leader of the group will use an authoritarian or autocratic leadership style to save your life!

Thus, to measure the appropriateness of the usage, one should look at the motivation of the leader for using the style. Autocratic leadership, also known as authoritarian leadership, is a leadership style characterized by individual control over all decisions and little input from group members." My thoughts are no matter what you call this style of leadership it would not be sustainable in the long run.

groups with democratic leaders only preformed well when the leader supervised Autocratic versus democratic leadership research showed all except: thoughtful attention to the needs of people for satisfying relationships. Difference Between Autocratic and Democratic Leadership July 10, By Surbhi S Leave a Comment Leadership is a skill, which requires a person, to influence the subordinates to work voluntarily, and stimulating them to put their efforts, in achieving the goals of the organisation.

Autocratic and democratic leadership styles are often talked about in a political context, however they manifest themselves in everyday life as well.

Political, community and business leaders come in many different varieties. Researchers have found that there are two main leadership types.

Authoritarian Leadership also referred to as Autocratic Leadership Style